1) What is the main purpose of structuring an argument in critical thinking?

2) An argument consists only of claims without any supporting reasons or evidence.

3) Systematic problem-solving techniques are essential for enhancing decision-making skills in various life scenarios.

4) Which of the following is an example of a deductive argument structure?

5) Inductive arguments start from specific observations and move towards a general conclusion.

6) Logical reasoning involves drawing conclusions based on feelings rather than premises.

7) What type of fallacy involves attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself?

8) The 'Straw man' fallacy involves misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.

9) Citing expert opinion as evidence without checking the expert's credentials is a recommended practice in constructing arguments.

10) Which skill is crucial for evaluating and constructing arguments effectively?

11) Structuring arguments is not necessary for logical reasoning.

12) Logical reasoning only applies to scientific contexts and not everyday decision-making.

13) In critical thinking, identifying the evidence is:

14) It's acceptable to use emotional appeals as the sole basis for an argument in critical thinking.

15) All arguments must include a claim, reasons, and evidence to be considered structured.

16) What does a "Red herring" fallacy involve?

17) Using a "Red herring" fallacy can strengthen the credibility of an argument.

18) Critical thinking can only be applied in academic and professional settings, not in personal life.

19) The main goal of the theoretical framework of critical thinking discussed in the guidebook is to:

20) Evaluating arguments is considered easier and more effective when they are well-structured.